question
probably what is lacking is the feel for it (or them even).. been watching drmas of photography.. shud noe long ago bout diz factor.. budden, how do you put it in? that's a que.. i wonder why, but sumhow, i'm onli gd at tt particular thing.. budden it cannot stand as a "topic"... it's juz part of a "topic".. i always wondered y i onli gd at tt 'sub-topic'.. by doing e cover, i tink i understood y.. i did one but messed it up a little wif my hua she tian zu..was tinking of doing another one tt is w/o e 'xtra added' coz i was rly pleased widdit.. bud while copyin out e skeleton, tinkin n noeing it wud b diff.. den a tot tt made me answered e main que.. i stopped trying to redo.. instead i attempt editting.. i noe i wudnt get bck e same quality, sensation as e original.. (which is wat usu happens) but i understood y e first cover n e prev exercise i did was so acceptable.. diz one was wif lurf, memris.. all shown thru the cover.. others mite not, but i saw it at tt moment.. e ex was done wif lurf, n "getting into character of e meaning of e wds"..
which leads to e nxt main que.. den y not get in2 charac in other topics?? coz other topics r wif limits? tt's y i karn do mor personal intrpretatn to it? issit true? or issit juz coz i locked it up.. the condence is not dere at all,tts y, issit? rite, shall not que any further.. brain will burst..
SYSW
